<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Note-Taking System on Po-Wei Chen, MD — Physiatrist &amp; Builder</title><link>https://drpwchen.com/en/tags/note-taking-system/</link><description>Recent content in Note-Taking System on Po-Wei Chen, MD — Physiatrist &amp; Builder</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 15:45:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://drpwchen.com/en/tags/note-taking-system/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Cross-Textbook Automated Note-Generation Workflow: A Product of the Board Examination</title><link>https://drpwchen.com/en/posts/textbook-to-note/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 15:45:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://drpwchen.com/en/posts/textbook-to-note/</guid><description>With over forty designated reference books for the board examination, and the same concepts scattered across multiple books, how could anyone possibly finish reading them? I tuned AI to my note-taking workflow, letting it organize textbooks structurally and with evidence. Today I open-sourced the whole setup, and this post covers the five hurdles I cleared along the way.</description></item></channel></rss>