<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Evidence-Based Medicine on Po-Wei Chen, MD — Physiatrist &amp; Builder</title><link>https://drpwchen.com/en/tags/evidence-based-medicine/</link><description>Recent content in Evidence-Based Medicine on Po-Wei Chen, MD — Physiatrist &amp; Builder</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 12:30:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://drpwchen.com/en/tags/evidence-based-medicine/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>I turned my journal club "paper-reading brain" into an AI skill, and forced it not to bullshit from impressions</title><link>https://drpwchen.com/en/posts/paper-tools/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 09:30:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://drpwchen.com/en/posts/paper-tools/</guid><description>I took the entire workflow of a journal club critical appraisal and wrote it into two Claude Code skills. I even wrote two deterministic little scripts to hand over the calculation of evidence certainty and logical flaws to code, stopping the AI from bullshitting based on overall impressions. It&amp;#39;s already open-sourced on GitHub.</description></item></channel></rss>